| General
Information About Legal Topics
Topic 112: Juvenile Court
(revised 11/97)
For more
than a century, the public has generally accepted the principle
that children who break the law should be treated differently
from adult criminals. Nevertheless, this concept continues
to be controversial.
One reason
for the controversy is that no one has ever devised a foolproof
way to deal with kids who break the law. Generally, children
are more likely to reform their ways than adult criminals.
So juvenile courts continue trying new strategies to reach
them. These strategies may be punitive in some respects but
they are primarily designed to rehabilitate.
For example,
when a youth is ordered to earn money to make restitution
to the victim of his crime, the intent is not to punish the
youth or to make the victim whole but to encourage the youth
to take responsibility for his/her actions.
The strategies
work with some children but don't with others. Juvenile officers
and judges must make better guesses as to strategies, based
on the information available to them. For this reason, most
states give juvenile courts broad powers and discretion in
dealing with juvenile delinquents, including several varieties
of probation and institutional placement.
The goal
is that the punishment plan fits the child, even if the punishment
doesn't fit the crime.
Some kids,
of course, are too hardened to change or too dangerous to
risk attempting rehabilitation in a juvenile treatment setting.
In those cases, all states provide some way for dealing with
children as adults in criminal court. In Missouri that way
is called a certification or waiver of jurisdiction proceeding.
Missouri
treats a juvenile as an adult only after an investigation
into the juvenile's background and a full hearing of the certification
issues. At such a hearing the juvenile has rights to be represented
by a lawyer and to present and oppose evidence as to whether
he should be treated as an adult.
Juveniles
who remain under the juvenile court's authority also are constitutionally
entitled to the help of a lawyer if they are charged with
breaking the law, to written notice of the charge and to a
trial where the charge must be proved beyond a reasonable
doubt. Juveniles have no constitutional right to a jury trial
in a juvenile court, although some states, other than Missouri,
have laws that provide them this right.
Most states
make juvenile court proceedings confidential, protecting children
from having the misdeeds of their youth held against them
throughout their lives. These courts have effectively performed
their task when such children are reformed into productive
adult members of society. |